1958 AC Ace vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 1967 Holden HR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,048 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Holden HR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 396 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Holden HR (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Holden HR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1967 Holden HR | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Ace | HR |
Year Released | 1958 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |