1958 AC Ace vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 631 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | AC | Dodge |
Model | Ace | Challenger |
Year Released | 1958 | 1969 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 421 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |