1958 AC Ace vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 20 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | AC | Riley |
Model | Ace | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1958 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 96 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 25 L |