1958 AC Ace vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 1971 Rover 2000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rover 2000 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Rover 2000 (172 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1971 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | AC | Rover |
| Model | Ace | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2640 mm |
