1958 AC Ace vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1974 Lotus Eclat is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Lotus Eclat (160 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Lotus Eclat should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 165 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Lotus Eclat (190 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 1974 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | AC | Lotus |
Model | Ace | Eclat |
Year Released | 1958 | 1974 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 190 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 67 L |