1958 AC Ace vs. 1981 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1981 Lancia Beta is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Lancia Beta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lancia Beta weights approximately 146 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lancia Beta. (134 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1981 Lancia Beta | |
Make | AC | Lancia |
Model | Ace | Beta |
Year Released | 1958 | 1981 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 134 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |