1958 AC Ace vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 120 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Ace | 102 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2160 mm |
