1958 AC Ace vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 310 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Because 1958 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Ace | E |
Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 896 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2630 mm |