1958 AC Ace vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 304 kg more than 1958 AC Ace.
Because 1958 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Ace | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 896 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2560 mm |