1958 AC Ace vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. (29 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. (41 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 1982 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ace | Minica |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 546 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2060 mm |
