1958 AC Ace vs. 1983 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1983 Toyota Cressida is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Cressida (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 280 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1983 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Cressida |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 162 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |