1958 AC Ace vs. 1983 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1983 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 194 kg more than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1983 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | AC | Volkswagen |
Model | Ace | Polo |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 59 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |