1958 AC Ace vs. 1995 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Ranger (159 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 561 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Ranger (305 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1995 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Ranger |
Year Released | 1958 | 1995 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2840 mm |