1958 AC Ace vs. 1999 AC Ace
To start off, 1999 AC Ace is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 AC Ace (351 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Ace weights approximately 131 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Ace (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 1999 AC Ace | |
Make | AC | AC |
Model | Ace | Ace |
Year Released | 1958 | 1999 |
Body Type | Roadster | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 351 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |