1958 AC Ace vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 164 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | AC | MCC |
Model | Ace | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1810 mm |