1958 AC Ace vs. 2002 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2002 Proton Tiara is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Proton Tiara. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton Tiara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 Proton Tiara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2002 Proton Tiara | |
Make | AC | Proton |
Model | Ace | Tiara |
Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2290 mm |