1958 AC Ace vs. 2003 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 583 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2003 Ford Taurus | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Taurus |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1477 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |