1958 AC Ace vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
| Make | AC | Kia |
| Model | Ace | Shuma II |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1593 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1958 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |
