1958 AC Ace vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 850 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Ace | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 208 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 84 L |