1958 AC Ace vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 937 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (278 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Ace | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1831 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 84 L |