1958 AC Ace vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (119 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | AC | Rover |
Model | Ace | 75 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |