1958 AC Ace vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | AC | Mazda |
| Model | Ace | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 76 L |
