1958 AC Ace vs. 2007 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2007 Smart ForTwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2007 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2007 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Ace weights approximately 150 kg more than 2007 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2007 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | AC | Smart |
Model | Ace | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 95 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 33 L |