1958 AC Ace vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (382 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 436 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Tundra |
Year Released | 1958 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 4190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |