1958 AC Ace vs. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 655 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2009 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | Traverse |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 83 L |