1958 AC Ace vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lada 21 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 184 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | AC | Lada |
Model | Ace | 21 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 131 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 43 L |