1958 AC Ace vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (372 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 943 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (542 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | AC | Dodge |
| Model | Ace | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 372 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1833 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |
