1958 AC Ace vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 632 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-150 (232 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | E-150 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 232 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 62 L |