1958 AC Ace vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Fit (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Fit weights approximately 253 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2010 Honda Fit | |
| Make | AC | Honda |
| Model | Ace | Fit |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 117 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1143 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1524 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2499 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 40 L |
