1958 AC Ace vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 958 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Ace | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 321 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |