1958 AC Ace vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (303 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (358 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2012 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Ace | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 303 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5001 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |
