1958 AC Ace vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Ace (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Ace (167 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 1958 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Ace | Clio |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |