1958 AC Ace vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Ace | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |
