1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 861 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Ace | CTS |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 302 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |