1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 890 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Ace | Equinox |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 71 L |