1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1721 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Ace | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Ace | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 150 L |
