1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1442 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Ace | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 459 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 93 L |