1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1671 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Tundra |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 544 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2561 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |