1958 AC Aceca vs. 1950 Buick 40
To start off, 1958 AC Aceca is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 746 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1950 Buick 40 | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | 40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4065 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3090 mm |