1958 AC Aceca vs. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1958 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 640 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
Make | AC | Austin-Healey |
Model | Aceca | Tickford |
Year Released | 1958 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2600 mm |