1958 AC Aceca vs. 1960 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1960 Cadillac Biarritz is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Biarritz (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1960 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | Biarritz |
Year Released | 1958 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |