1958 AC Aceca vs. 1961 AC Cobra
To start off, 1961 AC Cobra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 AC Cobra weights approximately 90 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1961 AC Cobra | |
Make | AC | AC |
Model | Aceca | Cobra |
Year Released | 1958 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |