1958 AC Aceca vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Nissan Cedric is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 436 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |
