1958 AC Aceca vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Triumph 2000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 351 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 1958 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1958 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Aceca | 2000 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |