1958 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 1976 Datsun 260Z is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 310 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 1976 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | AC | Datsun |
| Model | Aceca | 260Z |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2581 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
