1958 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Seat 133
To start off, 1976 Seat 133 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1976 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1976 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Aceca weights approximately 200 kg more than 1976 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1976 Seat 133 | |
Make | AC | Seat |
Model | Aceca | 133 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2030 mm |