1958 AC Aceca vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1958 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 65 L |