1958 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1992 Mini MK VI is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Aceca weights approximately 270 kg more than 1992 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1992 Mini MK VI | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | Aceca | MK VI |
Year Released | 1958 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2040 mm |