1958 AC Aceca vs. 1993 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1993 Chrysler ES is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Chrysler ES weights approximately 255 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1993 Chrysler ES | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | ES |
Year Released | 1958 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2470 mm |