1958 AC Aceca vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1958 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 340 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Aceca | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Tracker |
Year Released | 1958 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2210 mm |